Knowledge and Perception of Abortion among Klang Valley Population.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70672/8bd00456Keywords:
Abortion, Knowledge, Perception, Klang Valley populationAbstract
Background: Abortion remains a significant public health issue, posing substantial risks to the health and lives of women. Public awareness and understanding of abortion laws in Malaysia are often limited. This study aimed to assess the level of knowledge and perception toward abortion among the population in the Klang Valley. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a non-probability voluntary sampling technique, involving 391 respondents from Klang Valley. The structured questionnaire included three sections: demographic information, knowledge of abortion, and perception toward abortion. Results: Most of the respondents were aged 20–29 years (5.99%), female (63.17%) and belonged to the B40 income group (monthly household income <RM4,850) (70.09%). Analysis indicated that majority possessed poor knowledge of abortion (64.96%), and 58.06% held poor perceptions. Perception was significantly associated with age, ethnicity, religion, and marital status (p < 0.05), whereas knowledge showed no such sociodemographic correlations. A significant positive association was observed between knowledge level and perception (OR = 3.13, 95% CI: 2.03–4.81, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The study concludes that deficient knowledge and generally negative perceptions of abortion prevail in the Klang Valley. The demonstrated association between knowledge and perception necessitates evidence-based educational interventions to improve public understanding and foster supportive attitudes toward reproductive health.
References
1. Oxford Bibliographies. Abortion. 2023.
2. WHO. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. 2022.
3. Shah I, Ahman E. Safe Abortion: Global and Regional Incidence, Trends, Consequences, and Challenges. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009.
4. Ganatra B, Gerdts C, Rossier C, et al. Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010–14: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. Lancet. 2017.
5. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014.
6. Okonofua F. Abortion and Maternal Mortality in the Developing World. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006.
7. Reproductive Rights Advocacy Alliance Malaysia (RRAAM). 2007.
8. Tey NP. Proximate Determinants of Fertility in Peninsular Malaysia. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2011.
9. Singh S, Wulf D, Hussain R, Bankole A, Sedgh G. Unintended Pregnancy and Induced Abortion in Uganda. Guttmacher Institute. 2006.
10. Nai-peng Tey, Yew SY. Medical students’ attitudes towards abortion education: Malaysian perspective. PLoS One. 2012.
11. Sedgh G, Henshaw S, Singh S, Ahman E, Shah IH. Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide. Lancet. 2007.
12. Shellenberg KM, et al. Social stigma and disclosure about induced abortion. Glob Public Health. 2011.
13. Levandowski BA, Kalilani-Phiri L, Kachale F, et al. Investigating social consequences of unwanted pregnancy and unsafe abortion in Malawi. BMC Women's Health. 2012.
14. Izugbara CO, Egesa CP. Women, stigma and un/safe abortion in Kenya. Soc Sci Med. 2015.
15. Low WY, et al. Malaysian healthcare providers’ attitudes toward abortion. 2014.
16. Major B, et al. Abortion as stigma: Cognitive and emotional implications. 1999.
17. Harris LH. Stigma and abortion complications in the United States. 2012.
18. Mekonnen BD, et al. Knowledge, Attitude, and Associated Factors towards Safe Abortion. 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Asian Journal of Medicine & Health Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal of Engineering Technology (JET) is an open-access journal that follows the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0)



