Concordance of Intra-Operative Frozen Section Consultation with Final Histopathology Interpretations of Surgical Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors

  • Nurkhairul Bariyah Baharun Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Selangor, Shah Alam, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1120-145X
  • Ganesan Kumar Department of Pathology, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Diana Ong Bee Lan Department of Pathology, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70672/6b4qwd04

Keywords:

Concordance, diagnostic accuracy, frozen section, histopathology, intraoperative consultation, surgical pathology

Abstract

Introduction: Intraoperative frozen section (IFS) consultation provides rapid histological assessment during surgery and can guide decisions regarding tumour diagnosis, margin status, metastasis, and other clinically relevant pathological findings. This retrospective study evaluated concordance between IFS consultation and final histopathology for surgical specimens at the University Malaya Medical Center (UMMC). Methods: A total of 109 IFS cases performed from January to December 2022 were reviewed. Concordance was defined as agreement between the IFS interpretation and final histopathology for the principal intraoperative diagnostic question, with final formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded histopathology used as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Results: Of 109 cases, 106 (97.2%) were concordant, and three (2.8%) were discordant; all discordant cases were false negatives. Diagnostic accuracy was 97.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.2%-99.4%), sensitivity was 89.7% (95% CI, 72.6%-97.8%), specificity was 100% (95% CI, 95.5%-100%), PPV was 100% (95% CI, 86.8%-100%), and NPV was 96.4% (95% CI, 89.8%-99.2%). Among the three discordant cases, two were attributed to interpretation errors and one to a technical error. Conclusions: IFS consultation demonstrated high concordance and diagnostic accuracy in this study. However, false-negative results remain possible, particularly in head-and-neck and lymph node specimens, emphasizing the importance of representative tissue sampling, optimal section quality, and cautious interpretation in minimizing discordant results. Continued institutional audit is recommended to support ongoing quality improvement.

References

[1]. Popat VC, Dave ND, Atara A, Patel M, Pansuriya S. Advancements in intra-operative histology consultation through frozen section techniques. Int J Clin Diagn Pathol. 2024;7(1):13-17. https://doi:10.33545/pathol.2024.v7.i1a.549.

[2]. Chavda, Dr. C. I., Shah, Dr. A. M., Goswami, Dr. H. M., & Vaghani, Dr. J. A. (2023). Diagnostic accuracy of intra-operative frozen section at tertiary care center. International Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Pathology, 6(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.33545/pathol.2023.v6.i1a.504

[3]. Thin Win, T., SE, T. S., & AA, M. Z. (2020). Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative frozen sections in the diagnosis of central nervous system lesions: A hospital-based study. IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia, 19(3). https://doi:10.31436/imjm.v19i3.1662.

[4]. Arvindbhai, P. J., & Pravinchandra, P. B. (2021). Intraoperative frozen section analysis - A study of tertiary care centre. International Journal of Current Research and Review, 13(17). https://doi.org/10.31782/ijcrr.2021.131714

[5]. Al-Sabawy HB, Rahawi AM, Al-Mahmood SS. Standard techniques for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue: a pathologist’s perspective. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2021;35(Suppl 1):935-943. https://doi:10.33899/ijvs.2021.131918.2023.

[6]. Zinzala, Dr. U. C., Goswami, Dr. A. P., Goswami, Dr. P., Gondliya, Dr. J., Brahmbhatt, Dr. S., & Khandkar, Dr. A. (2020). A study on qualitative comparison between cryostat and conventional technique for histopathology diagnosis. Tropical Journal of Pathology and Microbiology, 6(1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.17511/jopm.2020.i01.10

[7]. Bharadwaj, B. S., Deka, M., Salvi, M., Das, B., & Goswami, B. (2022). Frozen section versus permanent section in cancer diagnosis.A single centre study. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care, 7(2), 247–251. https://doi:10.31557/apjcc.2022.7.2.247-251.

[8]. Abdallah, R., Khalil, A., Ghunaim, S., El Housheimi, A., Khalife, D., Sassine, D., Khoury, K., Mailhac, A., Nassour, F., Saliba, M., & Seoud, M. (2022). The accuracy and clinical impact of intraoperative frozen section in determining the extent of surgical intervention in patients with earlystage endometrial cancer. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 42(5), 1474–1481. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2021.2004583

[9]. Ali, J. P., Mallick, B. A., Rashid, K., Malik, U. A., Hashmi, A. A., Zia, S., Irfan, M., Khan, A., & Faridi, N. (2024). Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative frozen section for margin evaluation of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Research Notes, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104- 024-06698-8

[10]. Dave, D., & Mulay, S. (2023). Evaluation of intraoperative frozen section in surgical pathology at a tertiary health care centre. International Journal of Scientific Research, 42–44. https://doi.org/10.36106/ijsr/7406831

[11]. Elshanbary AA, Awad AA, Abdelsalam A, Ibrahim IH, Abdel-Aziz W, Darwish YB, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative frozen section biopsy for diagnosis of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022; 29:47931-47941. https://doi:10.1007/s11356-022-20569-4.

Downloads

Published

29-10-2026

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Baharun, N. B., Ganesan Kumar, & Diana Ong Bee Lan. (2026). Concordance of Intra-Operative Frozen Section Consultation with Final Histopathology Interpretations of Surgical Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis. Asian Journal of Medicine & Health Sciences, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.70672/6b4qwd04